Update: See comments.
Tuesday, March 21, 2006
Sound Machines - New Flickr Shot
flickr by turboswami. Anyone know what that giant knobbed rack is?
Update: See comments.
Update: See comments.
4 comments:
To reduce spam, comments for posts older than one week are not displayed until approved, usually same day. Do not insult people. For items for sale, do not ask if it is still available. Check the auction link and search for the item. Auctions are from various sellers and expire over time. Posts remain for the pics and historical purposes. This site is meant to be a daily snapshot of some of what was out there in the world of synths.
PREVIOUS PAGE
NEXT PAGE
HOME
© Matrixsynth - All posts are presented here for informative, historical and educative purposes as applicable within fair use.
MATRIXSYNTH is supported by affiliate links that use cookies to track clickthroughs and sales. See the privacy policy for details.
MATRIXSYNTH - EVERYTHING SYNTH
© Matrixsynth - All posts are presented here for informative, historical and educative purposes as applicable within fair use.
MATRIXSYNTH is supported by affiliate links that use cookies to track clickthroughs and sales. See the privacy policy for details.
MATRIXSYNTH - EVERYTHING SYNTH
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Looks like a lab-grade function generator. i.e. a big box that can put out sine/square/saw and the knob controls frequency.
ReplyDeleteKent is probably right, but when I saw it I wondered if it wasn't an old shortwave receiver from the '40s or '50s.
ReplyDeleteYes, it's actually a tube-driven Hewlett-Packard scientific oscillator, circa 1951. It can be found mounted in many of Raymond Scott's lab photographs.
ReplyDeleteI had 5 pics in this set, many of which featured the Mono/Poly and the oscillator with greater detail, as well as the DX-7 right behind, but, oh, the content sacrifices for that damned artsy angle!
Via Ed DMX: "that machine in the photo you were asking about is a reel-to-reel tape recorder without any tape on it. looks like a revox but it's hard to tell from the angle."
ReplyDelete