
site one
site two
Interesting note by Reed in the comments:
"Not long ago a 60-something rocket scientist visited my studio, looked at the Buchla & said, "that looks like what we used to simulate missile flights!" He said even after digital computers became the mainstay, the analog computers were much more accurate and a lot more intuitive to program. In his opinion, the digital ones took over because it was a lot quicker to recall earlier simulations... no messy patchcords, etc., but at the same time a lot of finesse was lost.
Sound familiar?"
Not long ago a 60-something rocket scientist visited my studio, looked at the Buchla & said, "that looks like what we used to simulate missile flights!" He said even after digital computers became the mainstay, the analog computers were much more accurate and a lot more intuitive to program. In his opinion, the digital ones took over because it was a lot quicker to recall earlier simulations... no messy patchcords, etc., but at the same time a lot of finesse was lost.
ReplyDeleteSound familiar?
Grr... couple of the equations in the "Chaos" paper were posted as images that didn't survive the archiving. Dan Slater would call that nonlinearity.
ReplyDelete