"dynamic MIDI-oriented music editing and realtime manipulation"Title link takes you there.
Thursday, August 31, 2006
5 comments:
To reduce spam, comments for posts older than one week are not displayed until approved, usually same day. Do not insult people. For items for sale, do not ask if it is still available. Check the auction link and search for the item. Auctions are from various sellers and expire over time. Posts remain for the pics and historical purposes. This site is meant to be a daily snapshot of some of what was out there in the world of synths.
PREVIOUS PAGE
NEXT PAGE
HOME
© Matrixsynth - All posts are presented here for informative, historical and educative purposes as applicable within fair use.
MATRIXSYNTH is supported by affiliate links that use cookies to track clickthroughs and sales. See the privacy policy for details.
MATRIXSYNTH - EVERYTHING SYNTH
© Matrixsynth - All posts are presented here for informative, historical and educative purposes as applicable within fair use.
MATRIXSYNTH is supported by affiliate links that use cookies to track clickthroughs and sales. See the privacy policy for details.
MATRIXSYNTH - EVERYTHING SYNTH
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
that's a nice piano roll, but the only real improvisation-oriented MIDI sequencer in the world is Numerology.
ReplyDeleteit also happens to be the only virtual analogue modular midi sequencer.
For a Modular Midi Step sequencer environment check out Joohn Dunn's
ReplyDeleteSoftstep! or the new Artwonk too.
http://algoart.com/
"...emulations of modular analog sequencers and software for creating algorithmic MIDI music and graphics from Fractals, DNA, EEGs, EKGs, and other data...."
Yep. I put up a post on Algorithmic Arts here: link.
ReplyDelete'the only real improvisation-oriented MIDI sequencer in the world'?
ReplyDeleteso opcode's vision, m, realtime on the atari st, korg's karma (and countless sequencers built to mimic 'analogue modular' ones) - they were all vaporware?
sequitur owes more to the algorithmic sequencers of the mid-80s than to the 70s step sequencer paradigm. lots of ways to manipulate MIDI and note data once it's been recorded. but i'm extrapolating from the older and less-featured BeOS version of sequitur, so what do i know...
just don't hate on the piano roll.
i would love to clarify my careless textual shooting-from-the-hip but you know why bother with anonymous posters.
ReplyDeletei'd privately email this guy and apologise for not mentioning M, explaining the differences between M and Numerology, and not clarifying "computer" and "modern", but of course there is no way to do that now.