Remember The Havestman utility panel in this post? The Harvestman dropped by with a link to their homepage. Title link takes you there. You'll find info on each of the following including specifications, examples of use and the video below.List of modules as of this post:
- model 2012 "malgorithm",
bit depth/sample rate reducer [nov 2006]
- model 1986 "zorlon cannon"
pitched noise and gates [feb 2007]
- model 9791 "hertz donut"
digital oscillator [early 2007]
- model 1991 "piston honda"
digital wavetable oscillator [early 2007]
afterwards: advanced signal processors and function generators.
malgorithm demonstration
YouTube via meatlog. "test of a voltage controlled bitcrusher just say no to signal fidelity http://www.theharvestman.org for more info!"
P.S. I love their logo.
The big problem with 'bits' is that they are square, like pixels. That's why when you reduce the bits, you get those squares on the oscilloscope.
ReplyDeletePooples, however, are round. So you can have a 1 poople system and make really round waves.
If we implemented digital with pooples, or even sqashles, then no one would complain about the digital/analogue difference anymore.
Poople researchers have made considerable advances in the tradeoff between error and loss-tolerance in quantum error correcting codes. Even Squashle tensor networks have improved the numerical study of infinite lattices (read: low-end). Audio entanglement can be observed using stroboscopic methods. Tight informationally complete measurements, and Blue-Ray DVD, have yeilded unconditional security of QKD from causality constraints (read: the new DRM). Some are hopeful that the born rule can be derrived from Phonon correlations of Pooples and Squashles in a Chirped Ion Trap.
I was wondering about leakage, but then you have Metasonix to take care of that.
ReplyDeletesounds like robots dying....
ReplyDeletei must have this... when can i get it??
ReplyDelete