images via this auction"It's also commonly said that the Juno-60 sounds "punchier" than the 106 because the 60 had the ability to modulate osc. pulse from an envelope."
I actually haven't heard this one often. Feel free to comment.
Thursday, January 10, 2008
Roland Juno-106
images via this auction"It's also commonly said that the Juno-60 sounds "punchier" than the 106 because the 60 had the ability to modulate osc. pulse from an envelope."
I actually haven't heard this one often. Feel free to comment.
3 comments:
Note: comments that insult people will be removed. Critique on gear is allowed. Do not ask if listings are still available. Click through auction links to check yourself. Posts and pics remain for historical purposes. To reduce spam, comments for posts older than one week are not displayed until approved (usually same day).
PREVIOUS PAGE
NEXT PAGE
HOME
© Matrixsynth - All posts are presented here for informative, historical and educative purposes as applicable within fair use.
MATRIXSYNTH is supported by affiliate links that use cookies to track clickthroughs and sales. See the privacy policy for details.
MATRIXSYNTH - EVERYTHING SYNTH
© Matrixsynth - All posts are presented here for informative, historical and educative purposes as applicable within fair use.
MATRIXSYNTH is supported by affiliate links that use cookies to track clickthroughs and sales. See the privacy policy for details.
MATRIXSYNTH - EVERYTHING SYNTH
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Havent' heard that either, but I wonder how that makes a box sound "punchier."
ReplyDeleteThe J60 uses the roland IR3R01 envelope chip. (same as Jupiter8) while the J106 uses software generated envelopes. Really they are very different synths even though they are nearly identical in architecture.
ReplyDeleteThe do sound noticeable different as well. I'm still trying to figure out if the JX10 and JX-8P are as noticeably different.
ReplyDelete