Saturday, July 21, 2007
3 comments:
Note: comments that insult people will be removed. Critique on gear is allowed. Do not ask if listings are still available. Click through auction links to check yourself. Posts and pics remain for historical purposes. To reduce spam, comments for posts older than one week are not displayed until approved (usually same day).
PREVIOUS PAGE
NEXT PAGE
HOME
© Matrixsynth - All posts are presented here for informative, historical and educative purposes as applicable within fair use.
MATRIXSYNTH is supported by affiliate links that use cookies to track clickthroughs and sales. See the privacy policy for details.
MATRIXSYNTH - EVERYTHING SYNTH
© Matrixsynth - All posts are presented here for informative, historical and educative purposes as applicable within fair use.
MATRIXSYNTH is supported by affiliate links that use cookies to track clickthroughs and sales. See the privacy policy for details.
MATRIXSYNTH - EVERYTHING SYNTH
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
This pad is so fucking awesome, that if I were a girl, I'd have 27 consecutive multiple orgasms. ^_^
ReplyDeletei've always been curious - is there a difference in sonic quality between the rack XT and the XTk as ridiculous as the mQ and the Q? (the Q sounding way better than the mQ) ... any difference at all?
ReplyDeleteNone at all. The MicroQ has different algorithms for the oscillators and filters, despite claims to the contrary. I wouldn't be surprised if the DACs on the Q are better as well.
ReplyDeleteTheres a tremendous difference between the sound of the DACs on my Q+ and XTk though. The XTk is pumping out a MUCH hotter signal at a slightly lower bitrate (20 bits on the XTk 30, 24bits on the Q+).
Thanks for the kind comments by the way :)