via sequencer.de
Wednesday, September 19, 2007
6 comments:
To reduce spam, comments for posts older than one week are not displayed until approved, usually same day. Do not insult people. For items for sale, do not ask if it is still available. Check the auction link and search for the item. Auctions are from various sellers and expire over time. Posts remain for the pics and historical purposes. This site is meant to be a daily snapshot of some of what was out there in the world of synths.
PREVIOUS PAGE
NEXT PAGE
HOME
© Matrixsynth - All posts are presented here for informative, historical and educative purposes as applicable within fair use.
MATRIXSYNTH is supported by affiliate links that use cookies to track clickthroughs and sales. See the privacy policy for details.
MATRIXSYNTH - EVERYTHING SYNTH
© Matrixsynth - All posts are presented here for informative, historical and educative purposes as applicable within fair use.
MATRIXSYNTH is supported by affiliate links that use cookies to track clickthroughs and sales. See the privacy policy for details.
MATRIXSYNTH - EVERYTHING SYNTH
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Hey Moogulator!
ReplyDeleteWas the Voyager, the left synth, the summed outputs (two LPF simultaneously?) because it's weird how the left synth's self-oscillation is ratty, while the right synth (MacBeth) is pure.
I haven't spent enough time on a Voyager to know about this.
left side Voyager right side M5. In the forum thread it is also described that the M5 has a more "aggressive" basic sound and a wider overall range - i.e. Filter Env Depth @ Voyager = max and M5= level 6. This comparison was really only about the filter detail, not the overall sound capacity
ReplyDeleteYeah, I noticed that the M5 had more high end. That's probably due to the wider range of the env depth. Funny, because it made the Voyager sound fatter. Also, It sounds like the Voyager's envs tend to clamp down quicker after a certain point, whereas the M5 env has a more natural response. I thought the resonance on M5 sounded too separate from the overall sound. A little clinical, but very high quality.I prefer the Voyager's filter grit.
ReplyDeleteI love the Voyager.
ReplyDeleteThe M5 is okay, but not my cup of tea.
His M3X however, is pretty awesome.
The X-Factor looks jucy.
I wonder why he stopped updating his web site?
He updates it about as regularly as he always has.
ReplyDeleteI'm familiar with both the voyager and M5. I prefer the sound of MacBeth filters(as well as envelopes)to the voyager's. The MacBeth sound has more 'presence.discrete'(to my ears). Not to knock the voyager...
ReplyDeleteThey actually sound great together in the comparison.Nice job Hosh!