Thursday, January 21, 2016
NAMM2016 Introducing the Buchla 260e Oscillator & 218 Stand Alone Keyboard
Published on Jan 21, 2016 Analogue Zone Showroom / Synths and Studio
"NAMM2016 Introducing the Buchla 260e Oscillator
Available soon from
http://www.analoguezone.com/"
LABELS/MORE:
Buchla,
NAMM,
NAMM2016,
New,
New Controllers,
New Controllers in 2016,
New Modules,
New Modules in 2016,
Video
4 comments:
Note: comments that insult people will be removed. Critique on gear is allowed. Do not ask if listings are still available. Click through auction links to check yourself. Posts and pics remain for historical purposes. To reduce spam, comments for posts older than one week are not displayed until approved (usually same day).
PREVIOUS PAGE
NEXT PAGE
HOME
© Matrixsynth - All posts are presented here for informative, historical and educative purposes as applicable within fair use.
MATRIXSYNTH is supported by affiliate links that use cookies to track clickthroughs and sales. See the privacy policy for details.
MATRIXSYNTH - EVERYTHING SYNTH













© Matrixsynth - All posts are presented here for informative, historical and educative purposes as applicable within fair use.
MATRIXSYNTH is supported by affiliate links that use cookies to track clickthroughs and sales. See the privacy policy for details.
MATRIXSYNTH - EVERYTHING SYNTH
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No the video is right about the 260e duophonic class Generator, introduced about 2005.
ReplyDeleteThanks. I found an earlier post mentioning it from January of 1010 so I removed the comment. This format of the site started in 2005, so either it never came in before 2010 or the site search is having issues, which wouldn't be too surprising considering how much comes in and goes up.
ReplyDeleteWell it did not ship in the year 1010 either. :-) I have a 260e.jpg dated Dec. 14, 2005 and product photo/description from Sept. 3, 2004. I recall it and the phasor coming out first as a "limited" deal, then the rest of the 200e was announced.
ReplyDeleteThat's what I meant.
ReplyDelete